FarmforAnswers Reports $60,000 Week on MyFundedFutures $150K Pro

Trader @FarmforAnswers posted on X on Thursday January 15 that he passed the MyFundedFutures $150K Pro evaluation and cited roughly $11,000 of profit per blown $50K Pro account, within a broader recap mentioning a $60,000 figure on another firm's live account.

The post, dated Thursday January 15, recounts a volatile stretch in which the trader says they hit the daily loss limit on another firm every day until Thursday, then describes activity across several prop accounts. Within that account, the trader says they passed the $150K Pro tier after repeatedly blowing $50K Pro accounts, citing $11,000 of profit on each before getting chopped up in the 10:00 to 10:30 window. The $60,000 figure attributed to MyFundedFutures sits inside this wider, candid recap rather than as a standalone certificate.

The proof here is a public X post with an attached image referenced by the trader, not a formal payout receipt from MyFundedFutures itself. The trader does not specify which instrument produced the MyFundedFutures gains, does not name a strategy, and does not attach a withdrawal confirmation for the firm in question. What the post does establish is a contemporaneous, on-record claim tied to a named handle and a timestamped URL, which is the form most retail payout proof takes in this segment.

“Keep blowing @MyFundedFutures 50k pro accounts, so I passed 150k pro. Made 11k on each.”— @FarmforAnswers on X, January 15

For context on the plan referenced, MyFundedFutures was founded in 2023 in Texas and runs evaluations exclusively on US futures venues including CME, CBOT, NYMEX and COMEX. The firm reports profit splits ranging from 80/20 to 90/10 depending on plan, with account sizes from $25K to $150K and, per its published rules, no daily loss limit beyond the trailing drawdown. Those mechanics are consistent with the trader's description of cycling through multiple $50K Pro accounts before clearing the $150K Pro tier.

Readers should weigh this proof for what it is: a self-reported trading week from an active account holder, with a screenshot referenced in the post and no independent confirmation of the dollar figures cited. The trader is transparent about losses, blown accounts and discipline lapses across several firms in the same message, which is itself a credibility marker, but it is not the same as a firm-issued payout statement. Treat the $60,000 as a claim documented on X on January 15, not as an audited result.