@zerodayjay Documents $9,200 Take Profit Trader Payout on X
Trader @zerodayjay posted on X that a $9,200 payout from Take Profit Trader was processed in March, alongside a self-reported running total of more than $13,000 in withdrawals from the firm.
The proof comes from a public X post by @zerodayjay dated March 20, in which the trader references $9,200 in payouts and states that, in aggregate, he is over $13,000 in payouts from prop firm activity that he tags with #takeprofittrader, #apextraderfunding, and #lucid. The post is unusual in tone for a payout receipt: it is a candid account of frustration, describing how a single impulsive trade on an account he calls PA613, which had been +$730 realized and in payout territory, was undone after he tried to add to the position and hit the daily loss limit.
The payout amount and the trader handle are the verifiable anchors here. The post does not disclose which specific Take Profit Trader account size produced the $9,200, the instrument traded, or the duration of the funded period leading to the withdrawal. Because the trader tags multiple firms in the same message, the $13,000 cumulative figure he cites should be read as his total across prop firms rather than a Take Profit Trader running balance.
“Somehow, despite all of it, I'm over $13K in payouts.”— @zerodayjay on X
Context from the firm helps frame the payout. Take Profit Trader, founded in 2021 and based in Orlando, runs US futures only and pays out on an 80/20 split on its PRO accounts and 90/10 on PRO+, with no withdrawal cap on either tier. The firm reports day-one payout eligibility on PRO with no minimum profitable days, which is consistent with a trader posting a five-figure withdrawal without referencing a long qualifying period. A $9,200 net payout is well above the $250 threshold at which the firm reports a $50 small-withdrawal fee applies.
What the post does establish is straightforward: a named trader, on a public platform, attaching the firm's name to a specific dollar figure and to the experience of being shaken out of a position before adding back in and breaching a daily loss limit. What it does not establish is the account tier, the contract size, or whether the $9,200 reflects a single withdrawal or a sum across cycles. Readers weighing the proof should treat it as a credible self-report rather than an audited statement, useful primarily because it is specific, dated, and tied to an identifiable handle.