@MajdocIn Posts Payout Request Across Six Top One Futures Ignite Accounts
Trader @MajdocIn disclosed on X on January 8 that he had submitted a first payout request against one of six Ignite accounts purchased from Top One Futures three weeks earlier, with the remaining five accounts becoming eligible the following day.
The post, published on X under the handle @MajdocIn, states that the trader spent $1,200 on six Ignite accounts from Top One Futures three weeks before the post date. He describes submitting his first payout request on one account on the Monday prior, while the other five accounts only became eligible a day later because he had missed copying trades on a single day. A certificate image was attached to the post.
The $1,200 figure in this proof refers to the trader's account purchase outlay, not a withdrawal amount. The post documents that payout requests were initiated, but it does not disclose the dollar value of any approved withdrawal, the account size tier within the Ignite plan, the instrument traded, or the strategy used. Readers should treat the proof as evidence of eligibility and request submission rather than confirmed receipt of funds.
“Three weeks ago, I bought 6 Ignite accounts from Top One Futures, spending $1,200.”— @MajdocIn on X, January 8
Top One Futures, founded in April 2025 in Wyoming, runs sim-funded futures evaluations across Tradovate and NinjaTrader with a 90/10 profit split on sim-funded accounts. The Ignite plan referenced in the post sits within a lineup that also includes Elite, Instant, S2F, and Legacy models, an overlap the firm's own structure makes difficult to parse from the outside. The firm reports more than $19 million paid out across 122 countries, a figure that remains self-stated.
The detail about a missed copy-trade day is the most operationally revealing part of the post. It implies the trader was running the same setup across multiple accounts in parallel, and that Top One Futures applies a trading-day requirement that resets eligibility when a day is skipped. That is consistent with the firm's published 10-day minimum trading window, though the exact consistency rule triggered here is not specified in the post.
The takeaway is narrow and concrete. A trader publicly identified a $1,200 purchase of six Ignite accounts, described the mechanics of becoming payout-eligible, and shared a certificate image as supporting evidence. Whether the requested payouts were paid, and at what amount, is not established by this post alone and would require a follow-up proof of receipt.