@vwapx Says a Bad Session Cost a $5,000 Top One Futures Payout

On April 11, the trader @vwapx posted on X that a losing session at Top One Futures had cost what would have been a $5,000 payout. The message was brief, candid, and accompanied by a screenshot referencing the firm.

The post itself is short. Replying in a thread that included @Saylor_lll and the Top One Futures handle, @vwapx wrote that they had been smashed that day too and threw away a $5,000 payout. An image was attached to the message, and the post is timestamped April 11 on X. The figure cited by the trader, $5,000, is the only monetary value in the proof.

What this proof documents is narrow but useful. It is a public, dated, on-platform admission from a trader that a withdrawal of that size was within reach and then lost on the same trading day. It is not a receipt of funds paid. The post does not disclose the account size used, the instrument traded, or the strategy that produced the drawdown, so any inference about position sizing or risk parameters would go beyond the evidence.

“I got smashed today too and threw away a $5K payout.”— @vwapx on X

The context around Top One Futures is relevant to how a $5,000 payout sits in the firm's economics. The firm offers sim-funded accounts ranging from $25,000 to $150,000 with a 90/10 profit split, and the firm reports more than $19 million paid to traders across 122 countries since launching in April 2025. A $5,000 withdrawal is consistent with that scale, though the proof here is the absence of one rather than its arrival.

The value of the post is in what it shows about trader behavior rather than firm performance. Public payout proofs skew heavily toward wins. A trader voluntarily flagging a forfeited payout, with the firm tagged, is a more honest data point than a celebratory screenshot, and it underscores how quickly an in-reach withdrawal can disappear inside a single session on a sim-funded account.