Abhiishek45 Documents $6,500 Tradeify Payout, Year Tally Hits $63,500
Trader @Abhiishek45 posted on X that he locked in $6,500 from Tradeify across two April sessions, with approval in 30 minutes and funds received within an hour. He puts his year-to-date total from the firm at more than $63,500.
The post, dated Thursday April 2, describes a $6,500 withdrawal cleared in roughly one hour after a 30 minute approval window. A payout screenshot is attached to the tweet. The trader frames the figure as the running result of two trading days in April rather than a single session, and treats it as an increment toward a yearly total he reports at $63,500 or more.
What the proof establishes is narrow but concrete: a payout amount, a same-hour settlement, and a public post identifying Tradeify as the counterparty. The post does not disclose the account size, the instruments traded, or the strategy used to generate the profit, and none of those details should be inferred from the screenshot alone.
“30 minutes of approval and got paid in 1 hour.”— @Abhiishek45 on X
For context, Tradeify was founded in June 2024 in Boca Raton and focuses on US futures across CME, COMEX, NYMEX, and CBOT. Its published structure pays a 90/10 profit split with traders keeping 100% of the first $15,000 on the Growth and Lightning plans before the split applies. The firm reports more than $200 million paid out to traders to date, a figure that is firm-stated and not independently verified.
The speed claim in the post, approval in 30 minutes and funds in an hour, aligns with Tradeify's marketing around its Rise-based payout pipeline, though individual experiences will vary by plan, day, and verification status. A single fast payout for one trader is not a guarantee of identical timing for others.
Taken on its own terms, the post is useful as one more dated, public data point in the Tradeify payout record: a named trader, a specific amount, a visible timestamp, and a screenshot. It is not, by itself, evidence of a repeatable edge or of the firm's overall payout reliability, and readers evaluating prop firms should weigh it alongside the broader review base rather than as a standalone endorsement.