Trader @chrisbtrades Posts $3,000 Tradeify Lightning Payout on X

On October 4, X user @chrisbtrades posted a $3,000 withdrawal from a Tradeify 150K Lightning funded account, pairing the payout screenshot with a candid note about a prior account lost to a Daily Loss Limit breach on NQ.

The post, dated Sunday October 4 on X, documents a $3,000 withdrawal from a Tradeify Lightning funded account that the trader identifies as a 150K plan. The attached screenshot and the trader's own account of the sequence provide the verifiable spine of this proof: a payout received, a prior account lost, and a return to the grind at zero progress toward the next threshold.

What makes the account more granular than a typical payout post is the honest reconstruction of a Daily Loss Limit breach. The trader attributes it to a copy trader leaving one extra contract open on the DLL day, which forced a reset. By his own math, climbing back required $4,500 in profit from a $5,000 drawdown, essentially re-passing an evaluation inside the funded environment before another payout could be requested. NQ is named as the traded instrument.

“Basically had to pass an entire new eval to get back to payout from DLL.”— @chrisbtrades on X

Tradeify, founded in June 2024 out of Boca Raton, structures its Lightning path as instant-funded, which lines up with the trader's reference to a 150K Lightning account rather than a staged evaluation. On Growth and Lightning plans the firm lets traders keep 100% of the first $15,000 in profit before a 90/10 split applies, context that frames why a $3,000 withdrawal at this stage is paid in full to the trader.

The proof does not establish the strategy used, the holding period, the exact entry account size at the time of the DLL event, or how long the funded account was active before this payout. It documents a single $3,000 withdrawal and a candid description of a setback, nothing more. Readers should treat the firm's broader $200M+ paid-out figure as self-reported, as Tradeify states it rather than publishes independently audited totals.

Taken on its own terms, the post is useful precisely because it is not a victory lap. It shows a payout clearing while also showing the cost of a rules violation on a trailing drawdown account, which is the kind of texture that distinguishes a credible proof from a marketing clip.