
@Bientrades Documents $4,000 First Payout From Tradeify
On August 9, the trader @Bientrades posted on X that a first payout of $4,000 had been received from Tradeify, set against 251.90 euros paid for five $25,000 evaluation accounts.
The post, published to X and accompanied by a screenshot, breaks the arithmetic down explicitly. Five $25,000 Tradeify accounts were acquired for 251.90 euros in one-time evaluation fees, and the first withdrawal from that cohort came back at $4,000. The trader frames the ratio as roughly a 1,200 percent return on account fees, a figure that reflects only the cost of entry rather than any broader trading performance.
One operational detail stands out in the post itself. The trader states the payout was generated while trading just one micro contract, an unusually conservative sizing choice for a funded evaluation. The post does not disclose which futures instrument was traded, the strategy used, or how long the accounts were active before the first withdrawal cleared, so the proof establishes the receipt and the size of the payout without extending to method or duration.

“That's roughly a 1,200% return on the account fees. All while trading just 1 micro.”— @Bientrades on X
Tradeify, founded in June 2024 out of Boca Raton, offers a 90/10 profit split with traders keeping the first $15,000 in full on its Growth and Lightning plans before the split applies. The firm reports having paid out more than $200 million to date, a figure it publishes itself and that has not been independently verified. Evaluations use a one-time fee with no recurring monthly billing, which is consistent with the 251.90 euro outlay the trader cites for all five accounts combined.
What the screenshot supports is narrow and specific: a $4,000 payout reached the trader, and the fee base for the underlying accounts was disclosed. It does not confirm the account tier the payout came from, the profit split applied, or whether the first $15,000 window on Growth or Lightning was in play. Readers weighing Tradeify on this evidence should treat the post as one dated data point from one funded trader, not a projection of typical outcomes.