FTMO paid $422 million for OANDA, new filings reveal.

A price tag, disclosed months after the deal closed.

FTMO's parent company, OHM, has filed its 2025 annual accounts, and the filings disclose for the first time how much FTMO actually paid to acquire the retail broker OANDA. When the deal closed on 1 December 2025, neither side put a number on it publicly. The newly published figure is over 8.79 billion Czech koruna, roughly $422 million at current exchange rates.

The same filings show FTMO's underlying business had a strong 2025. Consolidated revenue reached about 8.9 billion koruna (roughly $427 million), up 30 to 31 per cent year on year, driven by paid orders in FTMO's core prop trading business rising nearly 50 per cent to 1.27 million.

The numbers behind the deal.

• ✓FTMO paid approximately $422 million (8.79bn CZK) for OANDA, disclosed via annual filings rather than at the time of the deal.
• ✓The acquisition closed on 1 December 2025, after FTMO signed the purchase agreement with previous owner CVC Capital Partners in early 2025 and cleared five regulators.
• ✓FTMO's 2025 consolidated revenue grew 30 to 31% year on year to roughly $422 to $427 million.
• ✓Total consolidated assets reached about $1.47 billion and consolidated equity about $625 million as of 31 December 2025, reflecting the OANDA consolidation.
• ✓The US became FTMO's second-largest market behind the UK, driven by its OANDA partnership, which began even before the acquisition formally closed.

A small but real discrepancy in the record.

Outlets covering this story do not fully agree on what OANDA's previous owner, CVC, originally paid for it back in 2018. Finance Magnates and the figure repeated across most coverage puts it at roughly $160 million, while at least one other outlet cites approximately $175 million. Neither figure is FTMO's own disclosure, both trace back to reporting on the 2018 sale rather than a primary filing, and we have not been able to resolve which is correct. Either way, FTMO's price represents a substantial multiple of what CVC paid.

The filings do not detail what, if anything, changes operationally for OANDA going forward beyond FTMO's earlier statement that it plans to run OANDA as a standalone business.

A scale marker for the whole industry.

A retail prop firm paying nine figures for a regulated, licensed global broker is not a routine transaction in this sector. It is a concrete marker of how large the largest prop firms have become, and it matters beyond FTMO specifically because it signals a maturing industry where the biggest names have the balance sheets to acquire regulated infrastructure rather than simply licensing platform access from third parties.

It also has a direct practical angle for US traders. Because OANDA holds US regulatory licences, FTMO is now the only prop firm able to offer MetaTrader 5 to US clients, a market most competitors in this space cannot serve in the same way.

Watching for the next disclosure.

Worth watching: whether FTMO publishes further detail on how OANDA's licences and infrastructure get used across its wider prop offering, whether other large prop firms pursue similar broker acquisitions now that FTMO has set a public price benchmark, and whether the $160 million versus $175 million discrepancy on CVC's original purchase price gets resolved by a primary source.

If scale and financial backing matter to your choice of firm.

Acquisitions like this are one signal of a firm's financial depth, but they are only one factor. If you are weighing a futures-focused firm on pricing, platform support and payout terms rather than corporate scale, Apex Trader Funding is one of the sector's most established names and a common benchmark for comparison.

Our full Apex Trader Funding review covers the rules that matter and the ones that are mostly marketing. Code ONKAGNVZ applies 90% off evaluation fees during the current active sale.

Start your evaluation →

Promo code ONKAGNVZ

See the current Apex discount for full terms before you buy.