@austinsilverfx Reports $8,653.40 March Payout Total From Top One Futures
Trader @austinsilverfx posted on X that a $939 withdrawal received on the morning of March 31 brought their March payout total from Top One Futures to $8,653.40 across 14 separate payouts.
The post, published on X on March 31, frames the month as a cumulative tally rather than a single large withdrawal. According to the trader, the latest $939 transfer was the fourteenth payout received in March, lifting the month total to $8,653.40. The same post states the figure brings the running count to 30 payouts since December 29 on the same account.
The trader also notes spending $0 on evaluation challenges so far this year, characterizing the March total as cash drawn directly from the funded account at Top One Futures. The proof itself is a public social post with an attached image; it documents a self-reported running total rather than a single bank confirmation visible in the text.
“$0 spent on challenges this year, just straight cash to the pocket from @TopOneFutures”— @austinsilverfx on X, March 31
For context, Top One Futures operates on a 90/10 profit split for sim-funded accounts and offers account sizes from $25,000 to $150,000, with US futures routed through Tradovate and NinjaTrader. The firm reports having paid out more than $19 million across 122 countries, a figure it states publicly rather than one independently audited here.
What the post does not establish is also worth stating plainly. The trader does not disclose the account size being traded, the specific futures instruments used, or the strategy behind the 30 payouts. Readers should treat those gaps as unknown rather than inferred from the headline number.
The signal in this proof is frequency rather than scale. Fourteen payouts cleared inside a single calendar month, on top of a multi-month run on the same account, is the kind of cadence that aligns with the fast-withdrawal experience some Top One Futures traders have reported. Whether that cadence holds beyond the window shown in the post is something only future proofs can answer.