@Ckhangg_trades Reports $11,300 in Topstep Payouts Across Two Accounts
On April 3, X user @Ckhangg_trades posted a milestone update crediting Topstep with $11,300 in cumulative payouts, spread across nine separate approvals from two funded accounts.
The post, published on X by @Ckhangg_trades, documents a cumulative $11,300 in payouts across two funded accounts at Topstep. The trader reports four payouts from one account and five from another, describing the tally as a personal milestone rather than a single large withdrawal. The proof is the trader's own post; the underlying screenshot is referenced but the individual payout dates within the sequence are not itemized in the text.
Topstep, founded in 2012 in Chicago and focused on CME Group futures, publishes a 90/10 profit split for funded traders, with accounts opened before January 2026 keeping 100% of the first $10,000 in profits, as the firm reports. The firm also caps individual payout requests at $6,000, which is consistent with a total of $11,300 being received across nine separate requests rather than in a lump sum. That structural detail helps explain the shape of the milestone the trader is describing.
“9 payouts. 2 accounts. $11,300 paid out.”— @Ckhangg_trades on X
The post does not disclose which account size the trader is running, which futures contracts were traded, or the strategy behind the results. It also does not identify the specific approval dates for each of the nine payouts, so the pace at which the $11,300 accumulated cannot be verified from the text alone. Readers evaluating the proof should treat it as evidence of repeat payouts from two accounts rather than a full performance record.
What the post does establish is repetition. Nine approved payouts across two accounts is a pattern that is harder to fake than a single screenshot, and the trader frames the result as the product of routine execution, respecting small profit and loss outcomes, and following rules when the work felt boring. For a funded-trading audience skeptical of one-off wins, the repeat cadence is the substantive claim worth noting.
